Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 08:30

Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 3 + 4 gets pre-order exclusive demo and a Ninja Turtle - Eurogamer
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Appendix cancers on the rise in younger generations, study finds - NBC News
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Windows 10 is almost dead, but Flyby11 can help your old PC upgrade to Windows 11 - XDA
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Why are Republican politicians so afraid to oppose Trump?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Do polyphenols in mushrooms fight cancer or cause side effects?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
I Used to Dread Taking Creatine—Then I Found These Gummies - The Daily Beast
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
2025 Chiefs Training Camp Presented by Mosaic Life Care - Kansas City Chiefs
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.